How RealPage’s Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme Shook the Rental Market

Icon Legacy

MBSP

Muncy Homes

New Era

Signature

A Cautionary Tale That Could Have Long-Lasting Effect on Offsite Construction

In a recent antitrust lawsuit, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) pulled the curtain back on RealPage, a property management software company accused of facilitating a nationwide scheme to inflate rental prices. The ramifications of this legal battle are rippling through the rental property industry, leaving developers and managers questioning what comes next.

Let’s break down the story, how it unfolded, and its implications for rental property developers who now find themselves caught in the crossfire.

The Making of a Rental Titan

RealPage began as a tech-savvy disruptor, offering property management solutions to landlords and developers. Its flagship offering? Revenue management software designed to help landlords maximize profits by dynamically setting rental prices based on market trends, supply and demand, and competitor data.

At first glance, this seemed like a win-win. Landlords optimized their income while tenants, ostensibly, got market-aligned pricing. But critics argue that RealPage’s software did much more than just analyze trends—it allegedly facilitated collusion.

The Allegations

The DOJ’s lawsuit alleges that RealPage went beyond market analysis and directly contributed to suppressing competition among landlords. According to the government, the software aggregated sensitive rental data from competing property managers and provided coordinated pricing recommendations.

The result? An alleged artificial inflation of rental prices, leaving renters with fewer affordable options while landlords reaped the rewards of a less competitive market.

“This software isn’t about setting fair market value—it’s about squeezing every last penny out of tenants,” said an unnamed DOJ official. The lawsuit claims RealPage controlled about 80% of the commercial revenue management software market, making it a monopolistic force in the industry.

Impact on Rental Developers

For property developers, RealPage’s software has been a double-edged sword. On the one hand, developers using RealPage likely saw consistent returns on investment, thanks to optimized rental strategies. On the other hand, these allegations of collusion now cast a long shadow over their operations.

Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Risks
For years, developers relied on RealPage to stay competitive. The software allowed them to set prices that maximized profits while avoiding the risk of undercutting competitors. But with the DOJ’s lawsuit, developers who participated in these practices could face reputational damage and legal exposure.

“I trusted the technology to make us competitive,” said one property manager who asked to remain anonymous. “Now I wonder if we were part of something much bigger—and much more problematic—than we realized.”

Investor Concerns
Developers often rely on investors to fund new projects. Allegations of collusion could make those investors wary, leading to tighter scrutiny and potentially fewer funds for future developments. Ethical concerns around profiting from inflated rents could also deter socially conscious investment groups.

Market Instability
If RealPage is forced to scale back its services—or if courts mandate significant changes to how rental pricing algorithms operate—developers may need to adjust to new pricing strategies. This could result in market volatility as landlords navigate uncharted territory.

The Tenants’ Perspective

Tenants, of course, are the group most directly affected by the alleged price fixing. The average renter struggles to find affordable housing in many U.S. cities, and practices that inflate prices exacerbate this crisis. A widespread perception that developers and landlords participated in these practices could lead to a backlash.

Developers may see increased tenant activism, including calls for rent controls or stricter regulations on how rental pricing tools are used. Such measures could fundamentally reshape the rental market—and not necessarily in ways that benefit property developers.

Legal and Ethical Implications for Developers

The DOJ’s case against RealPage could set a precedent for how technology is used in the real estate sector. For developers, the lawsuit raises critical legal and ethical questions:

Legal Risks
Developers who used RealPage’s services may find themselves under legal scrutiny, particularly if they knowingly adopted practices that suppressed competition. Even unintentional involvement could result in fines, lawsuits, or damage to a company’s reputation.

Ethical Questions
Beyond the courtroom, developers must grapple with the ethical implications of relying on technology that may have harmed renters. This could lead to internal audits, policy changes, and a reevaluation of how pricing decisions are made.

Changing Landscape

The RealPage controversy underscores the growing tension between technological innovation and ethical business practices. For rental property developers, this case could serve as a wake-up call to rethink how they integrate technology into their operations.

Emerging Opportunities
Developers who distance themselves from controversial practices may find opportunities to appeal to ethically minded tenants and investors. Transparent pricing models, affordable housing initiatives, and a commitment to fair competition could set forward-thinking developers apart in a crowded market.

New Challenges
However, the road ahead won’t be easy. Developers accustomed to relying on algorithmic pricing will need to invest in alternative solutions, potentially increasing operational costs. Adapting to new regulations—should they emerge—will require flexibility and foresight.

The Broader Industry Impact

The RealPage lawsuit isn’t just about one company or one pricing model. It’s a microcosm of larger debates about the role of technology in shaping industries, the balance between profit and fairness, and the ethical responsibilities of businesses.

For developers, the key takeaway is clear: the tools you use to optimize profits can also expose you to risks if they’re not employed responsibly. As technology continues to evolve, developers must stay informed, adaptive, and committed to ethical practices.

What’s Next for Developers and Landlords?

The DOJ’s case against RealPage is ongoing, and its outcome could have far-reaching implications for the rental property industry. In the meantime, developers should consider taking proactive steps:

Review Pricing Practices
Conduct an internal review of pricing strategies and software tools to ensure compliance with antitrust laws.

Engage with Tenants
Building trust with tenants can help mitigate reputational damage. Transparency about pricing practices and a commitment to affordability could go a long way.

Monitor the Legal Landscape
Stay informed about the case and potential regulatory changes that could impact how rental pricing software is used.

Invest in Innovation
Explore alternative technologies and strategies that align with both business goals and ethical standards.

Modcoach Note

The RealPage controversy serves as a cautionary tale for rental property developers navigating the intersection of technology and ethics. While the immediate fallout may bring challenges, it also presents an opportunity to redefine industry standards and build a more transparent, fair, and sustainable rental market.

For developers, the choice is clear: adapt to the new reality or risk being left behind in a rapidly changing landscape. The future of rental housing may depend on it.