Back in the 1980s and 90s, going all-electric wasn’t a bold experiment—it was the norm. Builders, myself included, were practically nudged by power companies offering cash incentives, rate discounts, and marketing support to put “Total Electric” in bold print on our spec sheets. Kitchens with radiant cooktops, electric baseboard heating, central air conditioning—all tied neatly into a grid the utilities promised would keep getting cleaner and more reliable. For a while, it worked. Then came the rise of gas furnaces, high-efficiency boilers, and later, the rush toward heat pumps. Total electric started to sound old-fashioned, like shag carpeting and wood paneling.
But here we are, four decades later, watching the market make a sharp turn. The question isn’t whether all-electric homes are coming back. It’s why, and whether this new wave is sustainable or just another utility-driven cycle.
The Numbers Don’t Lie
A recent consumer survey shows that 37% of buyers today already prefer all-electric homes, with another 40% undecided but open to the idea. That means nearly four out of five potential buyers could be persuaded—if the economics, environmental arguments, and long-term reliability make sense.
The change isn’t driven by nostalgia or gimmicks. It’s being driven by three forces: policy, technology, and consumer sentiment. Federal and state policies are pouring billions into electrification incentives. Technology has delivered a new generation of heat pumps, induction ranges, and battery storage systems that don’t resemble the energy hogs of the 1980s. And buyers—especially younger ones—are looking at climate headlines, gas prices, and indoor air quality studies with new eyes.
Utilities: From Pushing Power to Managing Demand
In the 80s, utilities loved electric homes because they meant more kilowatt sales. Today, they want them for a different reason: managing carbon mandates and grid modernization. Most utilities have shifted from simply selling power to proving they can generate and deliver clean energy. A total electric home, tied to a smart meter and possibly paired with rooftop solar and battery backup, is a controllable unit in the new energy economy.
That means homeowners could see not just rebates for installing electric systems but dynamic pricing models—cheaper rates when renewable power is abundant, higher rates when demand spikes. Utilities are betting that consumers will accept those terms in exchange for cleaner air and lower upfront costs.
Builders Caught in the Middle
For builders, the all-electric shift brings headaches and opportunities. On one hand, selling buyers on the reliability of an all-electric system—especially in areas with spotty grids or frequent storms—is a challenge. On the other, simplifying a home to one fuel source reduces complexity in design and construction.
Some builders are already going all-in. In California and parts of the Northeast, codes are phasing out natural gas connections altogether. In other markets, builders are finding that younger buyers ask for induction cooktops and ducted heat pumps the way earlier generations asked for whirlpool tubs.
The sticking point is cost. Electric systems are often more expensive up front than a mid-efficiency gas furnace and water heater combo. The long-term savings only show up if electricity prices stay steady—or if subsidies remain generous. Builders know those guarantees are fragile.
Health and Safety: The Hidden Push
One factor that wasn’t on the table in the 1980s is now front and center: health. Study after study has tied gas stoves to indoor air pollution, childhood asthma, and poor ventilation in tight homes. That research, amplified by media attention, has pushed families to rethink what’s “healthy” in a home. Electric cooking and heating systems eliminate combustion in living spaces altogether.
The health argument is powerful because it crosses political lines. Even buyers skeptical of climate change are not skeptical of their children’s lungs.
The Real Power Play: The Fence Sitters
That 40% of buyers who are on the fence? They represent the tipping point. They’re not early adopters, but they’re watching their neighbors, their power bills, and their state legislators. Convincing them will come down to two things: proof of performance and proof of savings.
If builders, utilities, and regulators can show that all-electric homes perform in extreme climates and save money over 15 to 20 years, the tide could turn quickly. If they fail, the market could stall out, leaving buyers frustrated and builders reluctant to commit.
Lessons From the Past, Eyes on the Future
Those of us who lived through the first wave of all-electric homes remember both the promise and the pitfalls. The promise was convenience and simplicity. The pitfalls were rising energy costs, underperforming systems, and the eventual backlash that made “gas heat” a selling point in MLS listings.
This time, the stakes are higher. The climate clock is ticking, utilities are under pressure, and buyers are more informed. If the industry can get it right—delivering comfort, health, and real savings—the “Total Electric” label might not just make a comeback. It could become the default.
And if it doesn’t? We may be telling stories in another 30 years about how we tried, and failed, to flip the switch.
.
With over 9,000 published articles on modular and offsite construction, Gary Fleisher remains one of the most trusted voices in the industry.
.
CLICK HERE to read the latest edition
Contact Gary Fleisher
