It’s hard not to feel cynical when you hear about yet another housing summit, committee hearing, task force, or pilot program aimed at tackling America’s affordable housing crisis. From Washington, D.C. to state capitals, it sometimes seems like the only thing growing faster than rent is the number of PowerPoint presentations about how to fix it.
So—is that a fair assessment? Is it really just all talk?
Let’s be honest. Technically, there’s a lot happening. Billions in federal funds have been earmarked through programs like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, and Housing Choice Vouchers. The Biden administration launched the Housing Supply Action Plan to reduce regulatory barriers and incentivize construction. States like California and New York are pouring money into housing bonds, modular pilot projects, and streamlined permitting efforts.
But here’s what you don’t see often enough: houses actually getting built—at least not quickly, affordably, or in the places people need them most.
It Takes Forever
Even when a housing plan is announced with funding and political support, the process from idea to occupancy drags on for years. Federal money gets caught in layers of red tape. Developers face approval timelines that stretch into multiple election cycles. Local resistance, environmental reviews, endless community input sessions—everything seems designed to slow down progress. By the time something breaks ground, housing demand has doubled and costs have gone up.
Too Many Roadblocks, Not Enough Groundbreakings
Programs designed to encourage housing production get tangled in outdated zoning laws, opposition from neighbors, and bureaucratic permitting requirements. A single city council meeting with an angry crowd can delay or even kill a multi-unit affordable housing project. Regulations intended to protect neighborhoods often end up protecting the status quo and pushing working-class people further out of reach. The end result? Fewer homes, higher costs, and frustrated developers walking away from good projects.
“Affordable” Housing That Isn’t Affordable
We’ve reached the point where housing labeled “affordable” often costs more than 30% of a family’s income—sometimes far more. In some cities, units priced at $2,000 a month still fall under the “affordable” category by certain metrics. That’s not affordable to a teacher, a cashier, or a senior on a fixed income. Somewhere along the line, “affordable housing” stopped meaning what everyday Americans think it means—and became a catch-all for anything subsidized or slightly discounted.
Local Politics Slow Everything Down
While the federal government announces big plans and funding packages, it’s local governments that make or break actual construction. Zoning laws, land use policies, and neighborhood resistance are all handled at the local level. So even if Washington passes a major housing bill, a single town board or planning commission can grind things to a halt. Local elections often hinge on whether people want new housing near them, and many politicians would rather preserve votes than push through necessary—but unpopular—developments.
The Private Sector Can’t Fix It Alone
Public-private partnerships sound promising on paper. But the reality is that developers are navigating rising interest rates, inflated material costs, labor shortages, and razor-thin profit margins. When the math doesn’t work, projects get shelved. And when “affordable” housing relies entirely on developers making it pencil out, it’s no surprise the results are patchy and underwhelming. The market alone can’t solve a crisis created by decades of underbuilding and overregulation.
So, Is It Really Just Talk?
Not entirely. There are hardworking people in HUD, state housing agencies, and community organizations trying to push things forward. New policies supporting modular construction, accessory dwelling units, and density reform are gaining traction. But for the average American watching rent climb and homeownership slip further out of reach, it still feels like more panels than progress.
If the solution to a housing shortage is to build more housing—then build more housing. Americans are tired of promises and pilot programs while they’re stuck sleeping in their cars, doubling up with family, or giving up on homeownership altogether. Until we see results measured in homes, not headlines, it’s fair to ask the question: is anyone really doing anything besides talking?
.
With over 9,000 published articles on modular and offsite construction, Gary Fleisher remains one of the most trusted voices in the industry.
.
CLICK HERE to read the latest edition
Contact Gary Fleisher
